We are guilty of a grievous wrong against the villagers, and the only way in
which we can expiate it is by encouraging them to revive their lost
industries and arts by assuring them, of a ready market. There is no one
more patient and forbearing than God, but there comes a limit even to His
patience and forbearance. If we neglect our duty to our villages, we shall
be courting our own ruin. This duty is no onerous one. It is incredibly
simple. We have to be rural- minded and think of our necessities and the
necessities of our household in the terms of rural-mindedness. The task does
not involve much expenditure either. Volunteers are needed to go to the
nearest villages to assure them that all that they produce would find a
ready market in the towns and cities. This is a task which can be undertaken
by men and women of all castes and creeds, of all parties and all faiths. It
is in consonance with the true economics of our country.
There is hardly anything of daily use in the home which the villagers have not made before and cannot make even now. If we perform the mental trick and fix our gaze upon them, we immediately put millions of rupees into the pockets of the villagers, whereas at the present moment we are exploiting the villagers without making any return worth the name. It is time we arrested the progress of the tragedy. To me, the campaign against untouchability has begun to imply ever so much more than the eradication of the ceremonial untouchability of those who are labelled untouchables. For the city dweller, the villages have become untouchable. He does not know them, he will not live in them, and if he finds himself in a village, he will want to reproduce the city life there. This would be tolerable, if we could bring into being cities which would accommodate 30 crores of human beings. This is much more impossible than the one of reviving the village industries and stopping the progressive poverty, which is due as much to enforced unemployment as to any other cause.
The revival of the village is possible only when it is no more exploited. Industrialization on a mass scale will necessarily lead to passive or active exploitation of the villagers as the problems of competition and marketing come in. Therefore we have to concentrate on the village being self-contained, manufacturing mainly for use. Provided this character of the village industry is maintained, there would be no objection to villagers using even the modern machines and tools that they can make and can afford to use. Only they should not be used as a means of exploitation of others.