It is my conviction that the phenomenal growth of Congress is due to its acceptance and
enforcement, however imperfect, of the policy of non-violence. Time has arrived
to consider the nature of Congress non-violence. Is it nonviolence of the weak
and the helpless, or of the strong and the powerful? If it is the former, it
will never take us to our goal and, if long practised, may even render us or
ever unfit for self-government. The weak and helpless are non-violent in action
because they must be. But in reality they harbour violence in their breasts and
simply await opportunity for its display. It is necessary for Congressmen
individually and collectively to examine the quality of their non-violence. If
it does not come out of real strength, it would be best and honest for the
Congress to make such a declaration and make the necessary changes in its
By this time, i. e. after seventeen years' practice of non-violence, the Congress should be able to put forth non-violent army of volunteers numbering not a few thousands but lakhs who would be equal to every occasion where the police and the military are required. Thus, instead of one brave Paslhupatinath Gupta* who died in the attempt to secure peace, we should be able to produce hundreds. And a non-violent army acts unlike armed men, as well in times of peace as of disturbances. They would be constantly engaged in constructive activities that make riots impossible. Theirs will be the duty of seeking occasions for bringing warring communities together, carrying on peace propaganda, engaging in activities that would bring and keep them in touch with every single person, male and female, adult and child, in their parish or division. Such an army should be ready to cope with any emergency, and in order to still the frenzy of mobs should risk their lives in numbers sufficient for the purpose. A few hundred, may be a few thousand, such spotless deaths will once for all put an end to the riots. Surely a few hundred young men and women giving themselves deliberately to mob fury will be any day a cheap and braver method of dealing with such madness than the display and use of the police and the military.
It has been suggested that when we have our independence riots and the like will not occur. This seems to me to be an empty hope, if in the course of the struggle for freedom we do not understand and use the technique of non-violent action in every conceivable circumstance. To the extent that the Congress ministers have been obliged to make use of the police and the military, to that extent, in my opinion, we must admit our failure. That the ministers could not have done otherwise is unfortunately only too true. I should like every Congressman, I should like the Working Committee, to ask themselves why we have failed, if they think with me that we have.